Anil Kumar v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.10109 of 2018 ====================================================== Anil Kumar Son of Sri Birendra Kumar Resident of Flat No. - 204, Mahendra Apartment, North Patliputra Colony, P.S. - Patliputra, District - Patna, At present posted as a Executive Engineer (Mechanical) on deputation at South Bihar Circle Building Construction Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna, Original Department is Road Construction Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Road Construction Department, Govt. of Bihar.

2. The Principal Secretary, Home (Special) Department, Old Secretariat, Patna.

3. The Principal Secrerary, General Administrative Department, Govt. of Bihar, Old Secretariat, Patna.

4. The Special Secretary, Road Construction Department, Govt. of Bihar Vishweshwaraiya Bhawan, Bailey Road, Patna.

5. The Deputy Secretary (Management Cell), Road Construction Department, Govt. of Bihar, Vishweshwaraiya Bhawan, Bailey Road, Patna. .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Deepak Kumar Sinha, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. Syed Ikbal Ahmad -SC20 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVAJI PANDEY ORAL ORDER 19-09-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the facts of the present case are identical to the case of C.W.J.C. No. 4756 of 2009 (Aditya Narayan Roy Vs. The State of Bihar & Ors.), the aforesaid order squarely covers the issue involved in the present case.

In such view of the matter, the concerned authority is

Patna High Court CWJC No.10109 of 2018 (2) dt.19-09-2018 2 /2 directed to examine the facts, law and relief of the case of petitioner and if it is found that present case is squarely covered by the aforesaid case, the same benefit should also be extended to the petitioner.

With the aforesaid observations and directions, this writ petition is disposed of.

(Shivaji Pandey, J) Vinay/Sunny U