Ravi Das @ Ravi Kumar Das v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.90300 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-117 Year-2024 Thana- CHACKMEHSI District- Samastipur ====================================================== Ravi Das @ Ravi Kumar Das S/O Baidyanath Das Resident of Village - Dadhiya, P.S- Chakmehashi, Dist - Samastipur. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar.

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Raja Ram Mishra, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Mohammed Arif, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA SHEKHAR JHA ORAL ORDER 08-05-2025 Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing on behalf of the State.

2. The accused/petitioner apprehending his arrest in connection with Chakmehashi P.S. Case No. 117 of 2024, registered for the offences punishable under Sections126(2), 115(2), 118(1), 109, 308(3), 352 and 3(5) of BNS, 2023.

3. The allegation against the petitioner is to assault informant and others alongwith co-accused persons/family members by using "Gandasa" causing head and bodily injuries, with intention to cause their death. Occurrence alleged to be taken place due to financial dispute between the parties.

4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submitted that as per FIR, the allegation of physical assault is specifically available against co-accused Baidyanath Das, where just to make allegation aggravate, petitioner was alleged to hold the hand of the informant during the course of occurrence. It is

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.90300 of 2024(3) dt.08-05-2025 2/2 submitted that in fact the petitioner intervening during the occurrence as to prevent the parties to enter into physical assault but same was misunderstood by the informant as petitioner was helping the main co-accused persons. Petitioner said to be a man of clean antecedent.

5. Learned APP opposed the prayer of bail.

6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances and by taking note of fact as allegation of assault specifically available against co-accused, where the petitioner said to be a man of clean antecedent, accordingly, above named petitioner, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned trial Court, within a period of four weeks of the order, is directed to be released on bail furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned J.M.-1st Class, Samastipur/concerned Court, where the case is pending in connection with Chakmehashi P.S. Case No. 117 of 2024, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C./482(2) of the BNSS. (Chandra Shekhar Jha, J) veena/- U T