Sanjay Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.87960 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-306 Year-2021 Thana- ARA NAWADA District- Bhojpur ====================================================== Sanjay Kumar S/o Late Ashok Kumar R/o Village- Shitael Tola, P.S. -Ara Town, District- Bhojpur ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Vijay Shankar Shrivastava, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Ram Anurag Singh, A.P.P.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 28-01-2026

1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 341, 323, 354, 307, 448 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code as well as Section 27 of the Arms Act.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is a person with clean antecedent and the informant alleges that petitioner fired but missed and thereafter assaulted his brother Deepak by rod causing injury on his head. Further, unknown accused assaulted the another brother, namely, Suraj of the informant and the occurrence took place on account of dispute amongst the children.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has been falsely implicated in the instant case by the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.87960 of 2025(2) dt.28-01-2026 2/3 informant. It is further submitted that allegation of firing has been alleged only to give seriousness to the case. It is next submitted that injury suffered by Deepak and Suraj has been opined to be simple in nature and the blow is not alleged to have been repeated by the petitioner. It is reiterated and submitted that petitioner is a person with clean antecedent.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner and submits that no documentary evidence has been produced to substantiate that the injury suffered by the injured has been opined to be simple in nature on which learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that he has copy of the case diary. Learned A.P.P. perused the case diary and fairly submitted that the injury of Deepak and Suraj has been opined to be simple in nature.

6. After hearing the learned counsel for the parties, let the petitioner above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned trial court within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court where the case is pending/Successor Court in connection with Ara Nawada P.S. Case No. 306 of 2021, subject

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.87960 of 2025(2) dt.28-01-2026 3/3 to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C./482(2) of the BNSS.

(Satyavrat Verma, J) Kundan/- U T