← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/725/2026dismiss for nonprosecution

Sudama Mahto v. The State Of Bihar

2026-03-16Mr. Justice Dr. Anshuman2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.725 of 2026 ====================================================== Sudama Mahto S/o Ramrup Mahto, Resident of Village- Baghawana, P.S.- Sathi, District- West Champaran.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through the Chief Secretary, Government of Bihar, Patna. 2.

The Secretary, Home Department, Government of Bihar, Patna. 3.

The Director General of Police, Government of Bihar, Patna. 4.

The Inspector General, Headquarter, Patna, Bihar. 5.

The Bihar Staff Selection Commission, through its Secretary Bailey Road, P.O.- Veterinary College Campus, Sheikhpura, Patna-14. 6.

The Chairman, Bailey Road, P.O.- Veterinary College Campus, Sheikhpura, Patna-14.

... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Dhirendra Singh, Advocate For the State :

Ms. Deepanjali Gupta, AC to GP-10 For the BSSC :

Mr. Satyabir Bharti, Sr. Advocate Mr. Abhishek Anand, Advocate Ms. Kanupriya, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DR. ANSHUMAN ORAL ORDER 16-03-2026 The present matter has been listed under the heading For Orders (On Office Notes).

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner, learned counsel for the State and learned counsel for the Bihar Staff Selection Commission are present.

3. It transpires from Order No. 2 dated 02.02.2026 that four weeks' peremptory time was granted to the petitioner to remove the defects, as pointed out by the Stamp Reporter. However, the office note dated 13.03.2026 reflects that the said

Patna High Court CWJC No.725 of 2026(3) dt.16-03-2026 2/2 defects have not been removed as yet.

4. Under the circumstances, the present application stands dismissed for non-compliance of the peremptory order dated 02.02.2026.

5. However, the petitioner shall be at liberty to file an appropriate petition for restoration of the present application, if so advised.

(Dr. Anshuman, J) Ashwini/- U