Patna High CourtCWJC/12944/2018disposed

Lakhdeo Ram v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2018-07-12Mr. Justice Vikash Jain2 pages

Patna High Court CWJC No.12944 of 2018 dt.12-07-2018

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.12944 of 2018 =========================================================== Lakhdeo Ram, Son of Late Dargu Ram, Resident of Badhikhap, P.S.- Tandwa, District- Aurangabad, Bihar.

.... .... Petitioner

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

2. The District Magistrate, Aurangabad.

3. The Subdivisional Officer Aurangabad.

4. The District Supply Officer, Aurangabad.

5. The Block Supply Officer Nabinagar, Aurangabad.

6. The Anchal Adhikari, Nabinagar, Aurangabad. .... .... Respondents =========================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner : Mr. Nand Kishore Prasad Sinha, Advocate. For the Respondents : Mr. Arvind Ujjwal, SC-4 =========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL JUDGMENT Date: 12-07-2018 The present writ petition has been filed for a direction to the respondent no. 3 the Sub-Divisional Officer, Aurangabad to revive/renew the P.D.S licence no. 61/85 granted to the petitioner in the year 1985.

2. At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that it will suffice if the petitioner's representation dated 23.11.2017 (Annexure-4) filed before the Sub-Divisional Officer, Aurangabad (Respondent No. 3) is directed to be disposed of, in which event, the present writ petition need not be pressed on merits.

3. Learned counsel for the respondents appears and has

Patna High Court CWJC No.12944 of 2018 dt.12-07-2018 been heard.

4. Having regard to the nature of the grievances and the stand of the petitioner, the present writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the Sub-Divisional Officer, Aurangabad (Respondent No. 3) to consider and dispose of the petitioner's representation dated 23.11.2017 (Annexure-4), if the same is pending before him, after grant of opportunity of hearing to the petitioner in accordance with law expeditiously and preferably within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this judgment. (Vikash Jain, J) Md. Ibrarul/- AFR/NAFR NAFR CAV DATE N.A.

Uploading Date 13.07.2018 Transmission Date N.A.