Ranjan Kumar v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.2580 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-1003 Year-2024 Thana- MADHEPURA District- Madhepura ====================================================== Ranjan Kumar Son of Bimal Kishor Yadav Resident of Village- Katharwa, P.S.- Madhepura, (O.P. Bharrahi), District- Madhepura ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
The State of Bihar 2.
Amisha Kumari D/O- Binod Kumar jha, B.P.S.C Teacher, TRE-1, UhSS Bhadaul, At P.o- Bhadaul, P.S , Disrict- Madhepura, Teacher code- BPMAD22316137941 ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Durgesh Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Md. Shakir Ahmad, APP For the O.P. No.2 :
Mr. Rajesh Ranjan, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. SONI SHRIVASTAVA ORAL ORDER 14-08-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned APP for the State and learned counsel for the complainant.
2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 78, 308(2), 318(4) and 351(2) of the B.N.S, 2023.
3. As per prosecution case, the informant states that the petitioner took an amount of Rs.5,50,000/- from her account in a fraudulent manner.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has been falsely implicated in the case. As a matter of fact the petitioner was pressurized by the opposite party no.2 to marry her and when the petitioner denied for the marriage, the
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.2580 of 2025(9) dt.14-08-2025 2/3 instant F.I.R was lodged against him. The petitioner undertakes to co-operate in case/trial.
5. Learned counsel for the informant, however, opposes the grant of anticipatory bail who submits that the informant has been cheated by the petitioner.
6. At this stage, petitioner is ready to pay an amount of Rs. 2,70,000/- in three installments within a period of three months, which would be paid as "One Time Settlement" between the parties and the same is acceptable to the opposite party no.2.
7. In such view of the matter, I am inclined to grant the privilege of provisional bail to the petitioner upon making a payment of Rs.75,000/- (Rupees Seventy Five Thousand Only) as a first installment, a receipt of which would be shown at the time of furnishing of the bail bonds. Thereafter, the rest of the amount of Rs.1,95,000/- would be paid in two equal installment within a total period of two months from the date of furnishing of the bail bonds. It goes without saying that after the entire payment of the amount of Rs.2,70,000/- is made by the petitioner within the stipulated period, the provisional bail granted to the petitioner would be confirmed by the learned court below, and not otherwise.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.2580 of 2025(9) dt.14-08-2025 3/3
8. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, let the above named petitioner in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, be enlarged on provisional bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned court below where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Madhepura P.S. Case No.1003 of 2024, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C./482(2) of the B.N.S.S.
9. In the meantime, the parties would take steps to withdraw the cases filed against each other.
10. In view of the aforesaid observation and direction, the application stands disposed of.
(Soni Shrivastava, J) Harsh/- U T