Md Imdadullah @ Imdadulla @ Imdad v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.274 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-383 Year-2024 Thana- RANIGANJ District- Araria ====================================================== Md Imdadullah @ Imdadulla @ Imdad, Son of Sri Hafiz Habib Alam @ Hasibur Rahman @ Hasibur Rahaman, Resident of Village- Badi Rampur Ward No. 03, P.S.-Raniganj, District- Araria ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Ajay Kumar Thakur, Advocate Ms. Vaishnavi Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Shailendra Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 21-02-2025 Heard Mr. Ajay Kumar Thakur, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Shailendra Kumar, learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner has prayed for bail in connection with Raniganj P.S. Case No.383 of 2024 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 103(1) and 61(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and under Section 27 of the Arms Act.

3. The case of the prosecution is that the informant was married to Amroj Alam. Amroj Alam and informant were living separately from the rest of the family. It is further alleged that the rest of the family members has annoyance against them. It is alleged that two days prior to the occurrence Ali Ahmad has threatened that he will kill.

4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner along with others has killed the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.274 of 2025(3) dt.21-02-2025 2/2 husband of the informant. From perusal of the FIR itself, it transpires that the informant has not seen the occurrence rather she has suspected. During course of investigation this petitioner has given his confessional statement. In his confessional statement he has stated that he has taken the deceased on his bike. Except confessional statement there is nothing against the petitioner. No recovery has been made from the petitioner. The petitioner is having no criminal antecedent and he is in jail since 25.08.2024.

5. The learned APP for the State has opposed the application for bail.

6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-I, Araria in connection with Raniganj P.S. Case No. 383 of 2024.

(Ashok Kumar Pandey, J) durgesh/- U T