Dr. Aditi Abhilasha Jayaswal v. The State Of Bihar, Through The Principal Secretary, Higher Education Department, Government Of Bih

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.2546 of 2018 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.4991 of 2018 ====================================================== Dr. Aditi Abhilasha Jayaswal Wife of Sri Amit Prabhakar , D/o of Sri Anil Kumar Jayaswal Resident of Flat No. 105, Niromani Apartment, Jhauwa Kothi, Choti Khanjarpur, Near Sadar S.D.O. quarter, P.S. Barari, Bhagalpur. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State Of Bihar, Through The Principal Secretary, Higher Education Department, Government Of Bihar, namely, Sri R.K.Mahajan. 2.

The Principal Secretary, Higher Education Department, Government of Bihar, Patna namely Sri R.K. Mahajan.

3.

The Director, Higher Education, Government of Bihar, Patna namely Sri Sushil Kumar.

4.

The Tilka Manjhi Bhagalpur University, Bhagalpur through its Registrar namely Sri A.K. Jha.

5.

The Vice Chancellor, Tilka Manjhi Bhagalpur University, Bhagalpur, namely Sri Nalini Kant Jha.

6.

The Registrar, Tilka Manjhi Bhagalpur University, Bhagalpur namely Sri A.K. Jha.

7.

The Principal, Sharda Jhunjhunal Mahila College, Bhagalpur namely Smt Rekha Singhania.

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Sanjay Parasmani, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.A. R. Pandey, AAG-15 For the TMB University :

Mr. Ranjan Kumar Sinha, Adv.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH ORAL ORDER 11-01-2024 In order to show compliance of the order of this Court, disobedience whereof has been complained of, it is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that though the case of the petitioner was recommended for regularization by the Vice-Chancellor, Tilka Manjhi Bhagalpur University, Bhagalpur, however, the syndicate of the University has rejected

Patna High Court MJC No.2546 of 2018(13) dt.11-01-2024 2/2 the aforesaid proposal.

2.

In such view of the matter, the learned counsel for the petitioner seeks liberty on behalf of the petitioner to challenge the said decision of the syndicate dated 20.08.2020, by taking recourse to the due process of law. Liberty, so sought, is granted. 3.

The present contempt petition stands disposed off. (Mohit Kumar Shah, J) Ajay/- U