Patna High CourtCR. MISC./87899/2025dismissed

Baiju Kumar Yadav @ Baiju Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

2026-02-11Mr. Justice Sandeep Kumar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.87899 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-324 Year-2024 Thana- JAYNAGAR District- Madhubani ====================================================== Baiju Kumar Yadav @ Baiju Yadav S/o Jay Prakash Yadav R/o Village- Narar Uttar Tola, Ward No.7, P.S- Kaluahi, Dist- Madhubani. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Subhash Kumar Jha, Adv For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Shahabuddin Azeem @ S. Azeem, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER 11-02-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. This is the second attempt on behalf of the petitioner for grant of bail in connection with Jaynagar P.S.Case No. 324 of 2024 registered for the offence punishable under Section 109,118(1),3(5) of the BNS and section 27 of the Arms Act.

3. Earlier the bail application of the petitioner has been rejected vide order dated 14.05.2025 passed in Cr. Misc. No.28460 of 2025, which reads as under:- Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The applilcation is for grant of r egular bail in connection with Jaynagar P.S.Case No. 324 of 2024, registered for the offence under section

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.87899 of 2025(2) dt.11-02-2026 2/2 109,118(1) and 3(5) of the Bharitya Nyaya Sanhita and Section 27 of the Arms Act.

3. As per the F.I.R, named and unnamed criminals shot at the victim.

Petitioner is one of the accused who had reached the spot and tried to kill the victim.

4. The petitioner is in custody since 28.01.2025 and he has 12 criminal antecedents.

5. Considering the criminal antecedents of the petitioner, I am not inclined to extend the privilege of bail to the petitioner.

7. Accordingly, this application is dismissed."

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the charge has been framed.

5. Considering the gravity of the offence and the fact that the trial has started, I am not inclined to review my earlier order.

6. Accordingly, the application stands dismissed.

7. The learned trail court is directed to expedite the trail at the earliest.

(Sandeep Kumar, J) N.K/- U T