Amit Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.86898 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-110 Year-2018 Thana- PATNA GRP CASE District- Patna ====================================================== AMIT KUMAR, aged about 25 years, Male, Son of Vijay Shankar Prasad Resident of Village-Chandaura, P.S.-Kako, District-Jehanabad. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Mukesh Kumar Jha, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Nand Kishore Prasad (APP) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR ORAL ORDER 18-01-2020 Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

Petitioner, who is in custody, seeks bail in a case registered for the offences punishable under Section 394 of the Indian Penal Code.

As per F.I.R. the occurrence of robbery is against unknown.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that he is innocent and has committed no offence. He has been falsely implicated in this case. Petitioner is not named in the F.I.R. nor any incriminating articles has been recovered from the possession of the petitioner. Similarly placed co-accused has been granted bail by co-ordinate bench of this court vide order dated 23.04.2019 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 26355 of 2019.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.86898 of 2019(2) dt.18-01-2020 2/2 Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner named above be released on bail upon furnishing bail bond of Rs. 20,000/- (twenty thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned A.C.J.M., Railway Patna, in connection with G.R.P. Patna Case No. 110 of 2018, subject to conditions:

(1) Bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned.

(2) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be represented on each and every date fixed by the court.

(3) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner.

(S. Kumar, J) Rajiv/- U T