Kamadhin Yadav @ Bhoni Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.88379 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-162 Year-2012 Thana- BARH District- Patna ====================================================== Kamadhin Yadav @ Bhoni Yadav, Son of Late Subhash Yadav, R/O village - Soima, P.S.- Barh, District - Patna.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Naresh Dikshit, Advocate Ms. Shruti Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Sanjay Kumar Pandey, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 18-02-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that earlier the bail petition of this petitioner was rejected by this Court vide order dated 17.03.2025 with an observation that petitioner will be at liberty to renew his prayer for bail after six months if the trial is not concluded. It has also been submitted that the petitioner is languishing in judicial custody since 06.07.2023.

3. The brief facts of the case are that the petitioner has fired with pistol at the father of the informant due to which he died.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner has further submitted that from perusal of the status report of the learned trial Court, it is clear that charges were framed on 04.06.2025 and till

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.88379 of 2025(3) dt.18-02-2026 2/2 today no witness has been examined. Learned trial Court has reported that the trial will be concluded within three months.

5. Considering the above facts and circumstances of the case, this court is not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail at this stage and, as such, his prayer for bail stands again rejected.

6. However, petitioner will be at liberty to renew his prayer for bail after three months.

7. Learned trial Court is directed to conduct calendar trial of the petitioner so that the trial may be concluded within three months. Calendar trial means fixing the date in advance and dates to be informed to all the concerned including D.M and S.P. with a direction to furnish the evidence. (Ashok Kumar Pandey, J) lata/- U T