Satrudhan Rikiyasan v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.87982 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-261 Year-2025 Thana- AMAS District- Gaya ====================================================== Satrudhan Rikiyasan Son of Late Chander Rikiyasan Resident of village - Jhari, P.S.- Amas, District - Gayajee.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Kumar Nikhil, Advocate Mr. Aniket Thakur, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Jitendra Kumar Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA ORAL ORDER 22-01-2026 Heard Mr. Kumar Nikhil, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Jitendra Kumar Singh, learned APP for the State.

2. Petitioner seeks bail, who is in custody since 16.08.2025, in connection with Amas P.S. Case No. 261 of 2025, F.I.R. dated 16.08.2025 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 317(5), 318(4), 336(3) and 338 of the B.N.S.

3. Allegation against the petitioner is that he was apprehended along with stolen motorcycle.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation as alleged in the F.I.R. is false and fabricated and the petitioner has not committed any offence as alleged in the F.I.R.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.87982 of 2025(3) dt.22-01-2026 2/3 In fact, the petitioner has purchased the motorcycle in question to one Kamlesh Yadav and he has not given any paper to the petitioner and later on the petitioner has come to know that the motorcycle in question is looted motorcycle and he has no concern at all with the alleged recovery of motorcycle in question and he has purchased the same in good faith of coaccused person and he has already paid Rs. 20,000/- to the coaccused person. He further submits that the police after investigation submitted chargesheet against the petitioner and the petitioner is in custody since 16.08.2025.

5. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for bail of the petitioner and submits that the petitioner carries one more case pertaining to same motorcycle in question but the petitioner has not been remanded in that case as yet.

6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Sherghati, Gaya in connection with Amas P.S. Case No. 261 of 2025, subject to the following conditions :-

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.87982 of 2025(3) dt.22-01-2026 3/3

(1) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the Court and shall remain physically present as directed by the Court and on his absence on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his bail bond shall be cancelled by the Court below.

(2) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witness, in that case, the prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.

(3) And, further condition that the court below shall verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioner and in case at any stage, it is found that the petitioner has concealed his criminal antecedents, the court below shall take step for cancellation of bail bond of the petitioner. However, the acceptance of bail bonds in terms of the above-mentioned order shall not be delayed for purpose of or in the name of verification.

(Rajesh Kumar Verma, J) Ibrar//- U T