Ranjeet Kumar Singh @ Ranjit Singh And ANR v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.57836 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -48 Year- 2018 Thana -RIVILGANJ District- SARAN ======================================================

1. Ranjeet Kumar Singh @ Ranjit Singh, Son of Awadhesh Singh,

2. Munna Kumar Singh @ Munna Singh @ Prittam Singh @ Pritam Kr. Singh, Son of Parmatma Singh, Both R/o Village- Baiju Tola, P.S.- Revilganj, Distt- Saran at Chapra.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Chandra Mohan Jha For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Yogendra Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER 20-11-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.

The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in a case registered under Sections 341, 323, 324, 307, 504, 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

The prosecution case, in brief, is that when the informant was buying vegetables, he heard cry of his brother and saw that the petitioners and three unknown persons had caught hold of his brother and co-accused Vikash Kumar was stabbing into his abdomen.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioners that the petitioners have got no criminal antecedent. There is no allegation

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.57836 of 2018 (3) dt.20-11-2018 of tampering of witnesses alleged against the petitioners. The petitioners have falsely been implicated in this case. The petitioners are alleged to have caught hold of the victim at the time of occurrence. The allegation of stabbing is alleged against coaccused Vikash Kumar @ Tiger. No injury has been attributed against these petitioners.

On behalf of the State, it is submitted that the petitioners are named in the Complaint Case/F.I.R. The specific overt act is alleged against these petitioners. They are alleged to have caught hold of the victim at the time of occurrence. The nature of injury is said to be grievous.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, I am not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners. Accordingly, prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners in connection with Revilganj P.S. Case No. 48 of 2018 is rejected. If the petitioners surrender in the court below and seek regular bail, the same shall be considered on its own merit without being prejudiced by this order.

(Sudhir Singh, J) A.K.V./- U T