Baldev Soren v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.90507 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-136 Year-2025 Thana- BARHAT District- Jamui ====================================================== 1.
Baldev Soren S/o Mangal Soren R/o Village- Kaduatari, P.S- Barhat, Distt.- Jamui.
2.
Kishun Soren S/o Mangal Soren R/o Village- Kaduatari, P.S- Barhat, Distt.- Jamui.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Satya Prakash Parasar, Advocate For the State :
Mr. Ajit Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL ORDER 15-01-2026 Heard the parties.
2. The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in connection with Barhat P.S. Case No. 136 of 2025 registered for the offence under Sections 191(2), 191(3), 126(2), 115(2), 117(2), 109, 76, 352, 351(2) and 132 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, lodged on 06.09.2025 by the informant, Urmila Kumari.
3. As per the prosecution story, the Police on information, raided the house of Manoj Besra in search of liquor, allegation is that Dharo Yadav @ Dharmendra and Dablu Yadav instigated the villagers which followed the assault on the Police causing injuries. This led to the F.I.R.
2/4
4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submit that a perusal of the F.I.R. would show that main allegation is against Dharo Yadav @ Dharmendra and Dablu Yadav and the Police had gone to the house of Manoj Besra. Only because they are villagers, implicated. Further, without accepting the allegation and/or the outcome of the present petition, learned counsel for the petitioners submit that they intend to contribute Rs. 3,000/- each (totaling Rs. 6,000/-) to the Chief Minister's Relief Fund.
5. Learned APP opposes the prayer submitting that they have also been named who on the instigation the aforesaid two named accused abused/assaulted the Police.
6. Taking into account the submissions of the parties as also that the main allegation is against Dharo Yadav @ Dharmendra and Dablu Yadav, these two petitioners have no criminal antecedent, shall be facing the trial, in that background, this Court is inclined to extend them the privilege of anticipatory bail subject to payment of Rs. 3,000/- each (totaling Rs. 6,000/-) to the Chief Minister's Relief Fund through Demand Draft issued by the local branch of State Bank of India/any Nationalized Bank and the receipt be submitted to the learned trial Court.
7. Let the petitioners be released on bail in the event
3/4 of arrest or surrender within a period of four weeks from the receipt of this order, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand) each with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Jamui, in connection with Barhat P.S. Case No. 136 of 2025 subject to the following conditions:- (i) one of the bailor should be the family member/relative of the petitioner who shall provide official document (Aadhar Card/Voter Id/Driving License/Pan Card) to show his/her bona fide;
(ii) the petitioners shall appear on each and every date before the Trial Court and failure to do so for two consecutive dates without plausible reason will entail cancellation of their bail bond by the Trial Court itself;
(iii) the petitioners shall appear before the concerned police station every month for next six months to mark their attendance and at the end of the period a certificate be submitted before the Trial Court failing which the State shall be at liberty to take steps for cancellation of bail bonds; (iv) the petitioners shall in no way try to induce or promise or threat the witnesses or tamper with the evidences, failing which the State shall be at liberty to take steps for
4/4 cancellation of the bail bonds;
(v) the petitioners shall desist from committing any criminal offence again, failing which the State shall be at liberty to take steps for cancellation of bail bonds. (Rajiv Roy, J) vinayak/- U T