Akhilesh Singh @ Akhilesh Kumar @ Munna Singh @ Jitendra Kumar v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.83124 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-30 Year-2019 Thana- MAHILA P.S. District- Vaishali ====================================================== Akhilesh Singh @ Akhilesh Kumar @ Munna Singh @ Jitendra Kumar, Son of Lakshmandev Singh, Resident of Village - Patedha Jairam, P.S.- Belsar, District- Vaishali ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Vinay Ranjan For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Shailendra Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 21-01-2020 This is an application for grant of anticipatory bail in connection with Mahila P. S. Case No.30 of 2019, disclosing offences under Sections 376(ii) (e), 506 of IPC and Section 4 of POSCO Act.
As per F.I.R. petitioner is said to be committed rape upon the informant.
Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that the medical report does not support the commission of rape. She is major and allegation is of dragging the girl at the Chauraha and the same is not possible to any person to drag a major girl at the Chauraha for committing rape. Heard learned A.P.P. also, who has opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail stating that there is specific allegation against the petitioner is of committing rape in the F.I.R. and the
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.83124 of 2019(2) dt.21-01-2020 2/2 case is also under POSCO Act.
Having heard both sides, in view of the allegations, I am not inclined to grant privilege of anticipatory bail to the petitioner. However, he has to surrender before the learned court below and make prayer for regular bail.
With the aforesaid, this application is dismissed. (Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) Sunil Shukla/- U T