← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./1883/2026bail granted

Md. Shahzad v. The State Of Bihar

2026-01-19Mr. Justice Rajesh Kumar Verma3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.1883 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-1531 Year-2025 Thana- PHULWARISHARIF District- Patna ====================================================== Md. Shahzad S/o late Md. Yasin R/o Thkavai Biharshaqrif, P.S.- Biharsharif, District- Nalanda ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Faiz Naseem, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Madhura Nand Jha, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA ORAL ORDER 19-01-2026 Heard Mr. Faiz Naseem, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Madhura Nand Jha, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

2. The petitioner seeks bail, who is in custody since 17.09.2025 in connection with Phulwarisharif P.S. Case No. 1531 of 2025, F.I.R. dated 16.09.2025 for the offences punishable under Sections 8, 20(b)(ii)(B) of the N.D.P.S. Act.

3. According to prosecution case, total 1.10 Kg. of ganja was recovered from the possession of the petitioner.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has clean antecedent and the allegation as alleged in the F.I.R. is false and fabricated and the petitioner has not committed any offence as alleged in the F.I.R. Nothing has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. From bare perusal of seizure list, altogether 1.10 Kg. of ganja was

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.1883 of 2026(2) dt.19-01-2026 2/3 recovered from possession of petitioner but the same is less than the commercial quantity. There is non-complaince of section 50 of N.D.P.S. Act. He further submits that the police after investigation, submitted chargesheet against the petitioner and the petitioner is in custody since 17.09.2025.

5. Learned APP for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for bail of the petitioner.

6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, petitioner has clean antecedent and the recovery of alleged contraband is less than the commercial quantity, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Sessions Judge/Special Judge (NDPS), Patna in connection with Phulwari Sharif P.S. Case No. 1531 of 2025, with the following conditions:

i. Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the court and shall remain physically present as directed by the court and on her absence on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his/her bail bond shall be cancelled by the Court below. ii. If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.1883 of 2026(2) dt.19-01-2026 3/3 witnesses, in that case, the prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.

iii. And further condition that the court below shall verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioner and in case at any stage it is found that the petitioner has concealed his criminal antecedent, the court below shall take step for cancellation of bail bond of the petitioner. However, the acceptance of bail bonds in terms of the above-mentioned order shall not be delayed for purpose of or in the name of verification.

(Rajesh Kumar Verma, J) Ranjeet/- U T