← Library
Patna High CourtMJC/66/2025consigned

Vinay Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2025-09-19Mr. Justice Purnendu Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.66 of 2025 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.8494 of 2012 ====================================================== 1.

Vinay Kumar Son of Shri Surendra Prasad Gupta Resident of Mohalla-New Patna Colony,Beur, Police Station-Beur, District-Patna. 2.

Sanjay Kumar Son of Shri Bishnudeo Prasad Resident of MohallaSudamapuri Chapra Colony, New Jakkanpur, Police Station-Jakkanpur, District-Patna.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar 2.

Shri Daya Nidhan Pandey Secretary, Department of Art, Culture and Youth, Government of Bihar, Patna.

3.

Smt. Seema Tripathi, Joint Secretary-Cum-Director, Student and Youth Welfare, Art, Culture and Youth, Department, Government of Bihar, Patna. 4.

Lieutenant General Shri Gurbipal Singh, the Director General, Nagional Cadet Corps Directorate, West Block-4, R.K. Puram, New Delhi-110066 5.

Major General Shri A.S. Bajaj, the Additional Director General, National Cadet Corps Directorate, Bihar and Jharkhand, Rajendra Path, Patna. ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Suresh Kumar, Advocate Mr. Arbind Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Ram Tujabh Singh, C.G.C.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PURNENDU SINGH ORAL ORDER 19-09-2025 Heard Mr. Suresh Kumar, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners and Mr. Ram Tujabh Singh, learned C.G.C. for the opposite party/s.

2. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the opposite party submitted that reasoned orders contained in Memo No. 1609 dated 21.10.2024 and Memo No. 1614 dated 21.10.2024 have been passed and the order dated 07.05.2024

Patna High Court MJC No.66 of 2025(4) dt.19-09-2025 2/2 passed in CWJC No. 8494 of 2012 has been complied with.

3. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners seeks to avail remedy against the orders contained in Memo No. 1609 dated 21.10.2024 and Memo No. 1614 dated 21.10.2024.

4. Accordingly, the present petition is consigned with liberty to the petitioners to avail appropriate remedy in accordance with law.

(Purnendu Singh, J) Niraj/- U