Raushan Kumar v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.88208 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-891 Year-2025 Thana- SASARAM NAGAR District- Rohtas ====================================================== 1.
Raushan Kumar S/O Jitendra Kumar @ Jitendra Koal @ Jitendra Bansal Resident of village- Tarachandi, P.S.- Darigaon, District- Rohtas 2.
Uday KUmar S/O Bihari Koal Resident of village- Tarachandi, P.S.- Darigaon, District- Rohtas ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Shashi Kant For the Opposite Party/s :
Mrs. Sangeeta Sharma ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AJIT KUMAR ORAL ORDER 23-12-2025 Heard learned counsel for the parties.
2. The petitioners are seeking bail in connection with Sasaram (T) P.S. Case No.891 of 2025, dated 29.11.2025 registered for the offences under Sections 30(a) of Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act.
3. As per the FIR, police apprehended the petitioners and other co-accused persons and recovered 240 liters of country made liquor from two motorcycles parked in an orchard.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are innocent and have been falsely implicated in the present case solely on the basis of secret information. No recovery has been made from the petitioners or from their
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.88208 of 2025(2) dt.23-12-2025 2/2 constructive possession, and the petitioners have no connection with the alleged recovered liquor. It is further submitted that the petitioners have no concern with the motorcycles from which the recovery was made. The petitioners have been in judicial custody since 29.11.2025. Lastly, it is submitted that the petitioners have no criminal antecedents.
5. Learned APP for the State vehemently opposed the prayer for bail.
6. Regard being had to the submission made by the parties, and taking into consideration the period of custody of the petitioners, this Court is inclined to grant regular bail to the petitioners.
7. Let the petitioners, above named, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Exclusive Special Excise Judge-II, Sasaram/ Successor Court, in connection with Sasaram (T) P.S. Case No.891 of 2025.
(Ajit Kumar, J) shikha/- U T