Patna High CourtCR. MISC./91408/2025bail rejected

Nitish Kumar Singh @ Tulli Singh v. The State Of Bihar

2026-04-22Mr. Justice Anil Kumar Sinha2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.91408 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-323 Year-2025 Thana- MASHRAK District- Saran ====================================================== Nitish Kumar Singh @ Tulli Singh S/o- Chandraket Narayan Singh @ Chandraket Rai @ Chandraket Singh Village- Mashrakh Purab Tola , PSMashrakh Dist-Saran ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Ashok Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Upendra Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 22-04-2026

1. Heard the parties.

2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Mashrakh P.S. Case No. 323 of 2025 dated 21.07.2025 registered for the offence under Section 126(2), 115(2), 118(1), 109(1), 74, 303(2), 352, 351(2), 351(3), 3(5) of the B.N.S. 2023.

3. As per the F.I.R. on 21.07.2025 at 02:30 P.M. the petitioner along with four F.I.R. named accused and 10-15 unknown persons reached at the door of the informant and started abusing the informant and his family members. On protest, the petitioner assaulted the informant with knife with intention to kill which caused injury in his left hand and blood started oozing out.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.91408 of 2025(3) dt.22-04-2026 2/2 petitioner is innocent and has not committed any offence in the manner alleged. He further submits that though it is alleged that petitioner assaulted the informant with knife which caused bleeding, however, as per injury report nature of injury is simple caused by hard and blunt substance not by any sharp cutting or pointed weapon.

5. Regard being had to the submission advanced by the petitioner and taking into consideration the fact that petitioner is having five criminal antecedent, accordingly, I am not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. The same is rejected.

6. However, if the petitioner surrenders and seeks regular bail, it is expected that the learned court below shall consider the same on its own merit without being prejudiced by the fact that the present anticipatory bail application has been rejected by this court.

(Anil Kumar Sinha, J) praful/- U T