Md. Mangla @ Mangla Miyan v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.83251 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-273 Year-2018 Thana- JOGBANI District- Araria ====================================================== MD. MANGLA @ MANGLA MIYAN Son of Late Md. Domi @ Liyaquat @ Domi Miyan Resident of Village - Belahi, Ward No.10, P.S.- Jogbani, (Bathnaha), Distt.- Araria.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Anil Prasad Singh For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Anuj Kumar Shrivastava ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 16-12-2019 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Jogbani (Bathnaha) P.S.Case No.273 of 2018 registered for offences punishable under Sections 323, 341, 354(B), 379, 504, 506/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

As per FIR, there is allegation against the petitioner that he has assaulted the informant by fists and slaps causing injury to him and thereafter a panchayati was held and in the panchayati it was decided that the petitioner will pay the expenses of the treatment. It is further alleged that for that the daughter of the informant went to bring the amount and when she was abused and assaulted and she after coming to know about the same went to the house of the petitioner along with

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.83251 of 2019(2) dt.16-12-2019 2/2 her elder daughter, she was again assaulted brutally and thrashed on the ground and torn her clothes . There are some other allegations also.

Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that the whole allegation is false an and concocted and does not appear to be probable and the injuries are simple in nature. Heard learned A.P.P. also.

Having heard both sides and in view of the facts and circumstances, as stated above, I am not inclined to grant privilege of anticipatory bail to the petitioner, however, if the petitioner surrenders before the learned court below and pray for regular bail, the same shall be considered on its own merit without being prejudiced by the order of this court if possible to be disposed of on the same day.

With the aforesaid direction, this application is dismissed.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) chn/- U T