Rajan Kumar v. The State Of Bihar Through The Principal Secretary, Home Department
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.5 of 2025 In Criminal Writ Jurisdiction Case No.581 of 2022 ====================================================== Rajan Kumar son of Chandrashekhar Prasad, resident of village Madhopur, Police Station O.P. Madhopur, District Gopalganj. ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Home Department Government of Bihar, Patna Shri Chaitnya Prasad. 2.
Shri Alok Raj, Director General of Police, Bihar, Patna. 3.
Shri Sri Vinod Singh Gunjiyal, the Additional Chief Secretary, Department of Prohibition and Excise Department, Government of Bihar, Patna. 4.
Shri Avadhesh Dixit, Superintendent of Police, Gopalganj, Bihar. 5.
The Sub-Divisional Police Officer, Gopalganj Sadar, Bihar. 6.
The Sub-Divisional Police Officer, Gopalganj Sadar, District Gopalganj, Bihar, Pranjal Kumar.
7.
Shri Ashwani Kumar, Barauli Police Station, Barauli, District Gopalganj, Bihar.
8.
Shri Kameshwar Prasad, the S.H.O., Madhopur O.P., District Gopalganj, Bihar.
9.
Sunil Kumar, Assistant Sub Inspector of Police, Madhopur O.P. District Gopalganj, Bihar.
10.
Soni Devi, wife of Triloki Sah, resident of village Madhopur, Police Station Bharauli, District Gopalganj.
11.
Roshan Kumar, son of Triloki Sah, resident of village Madhopur, Police Station Barauli, District Gopalganj.
12.
Raj Kumar, son of Triloki Sah, resident of village Madhopur, Police Station Barauli, District Gopalganj.
... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mrs. Punam Kumari, Advocate Mr. Ravindra Nath Dubey, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Dr. Mankeshwar Tiwari, AC to AAG- 3 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DR. ANSHUMAN ORAL ORDER 18-07-2025 In view of the order dated 16.05.2025, by which four weeks' peremptory time was granted to the petitioner to remove
Patna High Court MJC No.5 of 2025(5) dt.18-07-2025 2/2 the defects as pointed out by the office, it is noted that the said defects could not be removed within the stipulated time, and the peremptory order could not be complied with.
2. As such, the present MJC application stands dismissed for default.
(Dr. Anshuman, J.) Aman Kumar/- U