Rahul Ranjan v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.65948 of 2018 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-262 Year-2018 Thana- PALIGANJ District- Patna ====================================================== Rahul Ranjan, Son of Rajendra Prasad Singh, Resident of Village- Tikulpur, P.S.- Sigori, District- Patna.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar.

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Siddharth Harsh For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Parmanand Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRAKASH CHANDRA JAISWAL ORAL ORDER 21-12-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned A.P.P. for the State.

The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Paliganj P.S. Case No. 262 of 2018 registered under Sections 420, 406, 354(A), 323 and 504/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

Informant deposited Rs.15000/- in the account of the petitioner for its payment to Sunni Raj in lieu of her admission in B.Ed Course on the assurance of Sunni Raj, but he did not manage the same. On demanding back money by the informant, Sunni Raj shared her mobile number among his friends and misbehaved with her and both the petitioner and Sunni Raj tried to outrage her modesty.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.65948 of 2018(2) dt.21-12-2018 2/3 It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner is quite innocent. He has committed no offence. He has been falsely implicated in the case. He happens to be Panchayat Teacher. As a matter of fact, Sunni Raj happens to be his previous student who is now studying in Bangalore and on his insistence he got Rs.15000/- transferred in his account from the informant for its payment to Sunni Raj. But as Sunni Raj did not receive the aforesaid amount from him, he returned back the said money to the informant on 04.05.2018 i.e. preceding to the date of occurrence. He had neither demanded any money nor assured the informant for her admission in B.Ed course nor misbehaved with her nor tried to outrage her modesty.

Informant has falsely implicated the petitioner due to grudge taking undue advantage of transferring of the aforesaid amount by her in the account of the petitioner. In the facts and circumstances of the case, let the above named petitioner, be released on bail, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of four weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned S.D.J.M., Danapur in connection with Paliganj P.S. Case No.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.65948 of 2018(2) dt.21-12-2018 3/3 the condition as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C. (Prakash Chandra Jaiswal, J) mantreshwar/- U T