Shivan Mandal v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.90511 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-88 Year-2021 Thana- TIKAPATTI District- Purnia ====================================================== 1.
Shivan Mandal S/o- Late Daso Mandal Village- Dumari PS-Tikapatti DisttPurnea 2.
Rina Devi W/o- Shivan Mandal Village- Dumari PS-Tikapatti Distt- Purnea 3.
Rinki Devi W/o- Mithun Mandal Village- Dumari PS-Tikapatti Distt- Purnea ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Bijendra Kumar Singh, Advocate For the State :
Mr. Binod Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL ORDER 15-01-2026 Heard the parties.
2. The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in connection with Tikapatti P.S. Case No. 88 of 2021 registered for the offence under Sections 341, 323, 324, 307, 504, 379 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code, lodged on 29.09.2021 by the informant, Urmila Devi.
3. As per the prosecution story, the informant alleged that in a quarrel between kids, the elders also entered which led to fight/injuries and the F.I.R.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submit that two of the petitioners are ladies, none have criminal antecedent, there is a counter case also which is earlier in the present case.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.90511 of 2025(2) dt.15-01-2026 2/3 Last submission is that they have also come into compromise.
5. Learned APP opposes the prayer submitting that they are approached this Court belatedly and may be processes have been issued.
6. Learned counsel for the petitioners submit that no processes have been issued and if such statement is found incorrect and relief granted, the same may become infructuous.
7. Taking into account submissions of the parties as also that there is case and counter case, two of them are lades and an undertaking has been given that they shall be diligently appearing in trial, in that background, this Court is inclined to extend them the privilege of anticipatory bail.
8. However, if the statement made that no processes have been issued against the petitioners are incorrect, the order shall become infructuous.
9. Let the petitioners be released on bail in the event of arrest or surrender within a period of four weeks from the receipt of this order, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand) each with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Sessions Judge-IV, Purnea, in connection with Tikapatti P.S. Case No. 88 of 2021 subject to the following conditions:-
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.90511 of 2025(2) dt.15-01-2026 3/3 (i) one of the bailor should be the family member/relative of the petitioner who shall provide official document (Aadhar Card/Voter Id/Driving License/Pan Card) to show his/her bona fide;
(ii) the petitioners shall appear on each and every date before the Trial Court and failure to do so for two consecutive dates without plausible reason will entail cancellation of their bail bond by the Trial Court itself;
(iii) the petitioners shall in no way try to induce or promise or threat the witnesses or tamper with the evidences, failing which the State shall be at liberty to take steps for cancellation of the bail bonds;
(iv) the petitioners shall desist from committing any criminal offence again, failing which the State shall be at liberty to take steps for cancellation of bail bonds. (Rajiv Roy, J) vinayak/- U T