Mansur Ansari @ Md. Mansoor Ansari v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.88107 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-133 Year-2025 Thana- BASOPATTI District- Madhubani ====================================================== Mansur Ansari @ Md. Mansoor Ansari S/o Amsul Ansari Resident of VillageNaya Toal Dubhi Bazar, PS- Basopatii, Dist- Madhubani ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Bhavesh Kumar Sah, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Syed Mojibur Rahman, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA ORAL ORDER 15-01-2026 Heard Mr. Bhavesh Kumar Sah, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Syed Mojihar Rahman, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.
2. The petitioner seeks bail, who is in custody since 25.09.2025 in connection with Basopatti P.S. Case No. 133 of 2025, F.I.R. dated 16.06.2025 for the offences punishable under Sections 189(2), 126(2), 115 (2), 103(2), 109 of the B.N.S.
3. According to prosecution case, petitioner and other co-accused persons are alleged to have reached at the informant house and assaulted to the informant and his family members by lathi, danda, farsa, sword due to which some persons got injured.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has clean antecedent and he has falsely been
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.88107 of 2025(2) dt.15-01-2026 2/3 implicated in the present case. Although the petitioner is named in the F.I.R. but from perusal of the F.I.R. it appears that there is no specific allegation of assault alleged against the petitioner rather the allegation are general and omnibus in nature. The police after investigation, submitted chargesheet against the petitioner and the petitioner is in custody since 25.10.2025. 5.
Learned Additional Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the prayer for bail of the petitioner.
6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, petitioner has clean antecedent, there is no specific allegation of assault is attributed against the petitioner, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Madhubani, in connection with Basopatti P.S. Case No. 133 of 2025, with the following conditions:
i. Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the court and shall remain physically present as directed by the court and on her absence on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his/her bail bond shall be cancelled by the Court below. ii. If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.88107 of 2025(2) dt.15-01-2026 3/3 witnesses, in that case, the prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.
iii. And further condition that the court below shall verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioner and in case at any stage it is found that the petitioner has concealed his criminal antecedent, the court below shall take step for cancellation of bail bond of the petitioner. However, the acceptance of bail bonds in terms of the above-mentioned order shall not be delayed for purpose of or in the name of verification.
(Rajesh Kumar Verma, J) Ranjeet/- U T