Birendra Singh @ Birendra Kumar Singh v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.67887 of 2018 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-222 Year-2018 Thana- BELHAR District- Banka ====================================================== Birendra Singh @ Birendra Kumar Singh, Son of Late Baleshwar, Singh, Resident of Village-Dhouri, P.S.-Belhar, District-Banka. ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Anuj Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Sri Ramchandra Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR ORAL ORDER 28-11-2018 Heard learned counsel for the parties.
Petitioner seeks bail in Belhar P.S. Case No. 222 of 2018 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 414, 120B, 121A/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 4/5 of the Explosive Substances Act.
Allegation against the petitioner is of recovery of 100 Kg of Ammonium Nitrate from the godown built on the land of the petitioner.
It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that he is innocent and has been falsely implicated in this case as he is father of accused Niraj Singh. It has been further submitted that Ammonium Nitrate is not used for making I.E.D bombs but it is also used as fertilizer. Petitioner has got no criminal antecedent and is in custody since 10.08.2018.
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.67887 of 2018(2) dt.28-11-2018 2/2 Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner named above be released on bail upon furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Banka, in connection with Belhar P.S. Case No. 222 of 2018, with following conditions:- (1)Bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned.
(2) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be represented on each and every date fixed by the court.
(3) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner.
(S. Kumar, J) ranjan/- U