Rajesh Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.88345 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-139 Year-2023 Thana- SUGAULI District- East Champaran ====================================================== Rajesh Yadav Son of Asarphi Yadav Resident of village - Gudra, P.S.- Majhawaliya, District - West Champaran.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Sharda Nand Mishra, Advocate Mr.Dhandev Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Binod Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER 27-02-2026 Heard the parties.

2. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Sugauli P.S. Case No. 139 of 2023 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 341, 323, 324, 307, 435/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act.

3. While the informant was engaged in constructing the boundary wall on his land, in the meanwhile, the petitioner along with other co-accused and 10 unknown persons came there and brutally assaulted him. It is specifically alleged that one Virendra Yadav assaulted the informant by means of spade, due to which he sustained injury over his shoulder. There is further allegation against the other accused persons of making

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.88345 of 2025(3) dt.27-02-2026 2/3 indiscriminate firing.

4. It has been submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner is innocent and he has falsely been implicated in this case. Learned counsel further submits that the main accused person who gave a spade blow to the informant has been granted anticipatory bail by a Co-ordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 19.11.2025 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 66564/2025. It is next submitted that the injury sustained by the victim is simple in nature. Petitioner has clean antecedent.

5. On the other hand, learned APP for the State vehemently opposes the bail application and submits that the petitioner brutally assaulted the victim and moreover the final report of one of the injury has yet to come.

6. Having considered the submissions advanced by the learned Advocate for the respective parties and taking note of the factum of case and counter case, coupled with the injury report as well as fair antecedent of the petitioner and the genesis of the occurrence, let the petitioner, named above, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the court below within four weeks from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.88345 of 2025(3) dt.27-02-2026 3/3 amount each to the satisfaction of learned Sessions Judge, East Champaran, Motihari in connection with Sugauli P.S. Case No. 139 of 2023, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 482 (2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 with the further condition that one of the bailors shall be the own/close relative of the petitioner.

(Sandeep Kumar, J) tusharika/- U T