Abhay Kumar @ Ghunghuru @ Ghunghuru Singh v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.88840 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-303 Year-2025 Thana- TEGHRHA District- Begusarai ====================================================== Abhay Kumar @ Ghunghuru @ Ghunghuru Singh Son of Binod Singh Resident of Village - Madhurapur, Dakshinwari Tola, P.S.- Teghra, District - Begusarai.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Amritesh Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Chandra Bhushan Prasad, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 22-01-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned APP for the State and learned counsel for the informant.

2. The petitioner has prayed for regular bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under sections 115(2), 126(2), 109, 351(2), 308(4), 303(2) and 3(5) of B.N.S.

3. The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner has assaulted with the butt of the gun on the head of the informant.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that there is also a counter version of this case and he has fairly submitted that petitioner is having criminal antecedent of thirteen cases whereas the informant is also having criminal antecedent of fifteen cases. It has further been submitted that from perusal of the injury report

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.88840 of 2025(2) dt.22-01-2026 2/2 which is Annexure P/3, it will transpire that the nature of injury is simple as it is alleged that the petitioner was having a gun and he has only assaulted with the butt it shows that, he was not having any intention to kill otherwise, he would have fired. Moreover, the petitioner is languishing in judicial custody since 21.09.2025.

5. Learned APP appearing for the State and learned counsel for the informant have vehemently opposed the prayer of regular bail. Learned counsel for the informant has submitted that petitioner is having criminal antecedent and he has injured the informant.

6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be released on bail in connection with Teghra P.S. Case No. 303 of 2025 on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Begusarai.

(Ashok Kumar Pandey, J) Shubham/- U T