Vikas Kumar @ Shera v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.88050 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-343 Year-2025 Thana- PAKARIBARAW District- Nawada ====================================================== Vikas Kumar @ Shera S/O Manikchand Malakar @ Manikchand Mali @ Manika Mali R/O Vill.- Taraun, P.S.- Kawakol, Dist.- Nawada ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Shankar Kumar, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Akshay Lal Pandit, APP ========================= ============================= CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RUDRA PRAKASH MISHRA ORAL ORDER 13-01-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Pakribarawan P.S. Case No. 343 of 2025 instituted for the offence under Sections 317(2), 317(4), 111(2), 111(3) & 114(4) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.

3. The prosecution case, in brief, is that during patrolling, police intercepted two motorcycles and Rohit Kumar @ Ishu was apprehended while three others fled away. On interrogation, the seized bikes were found to be stolen.

4. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner is in custody since 27.09.2025. Petitioner bears one criminal antecedent, as per disclosure made in paragraph No. 3 of the bail application.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.88050 of 2025(2) dt.13-01-2026 2/2

5. It has been further submitted by the petitioner's counsel that petitioner has been falsely implicated in the present case. Referring to the FIR, it is pertinently submitted that petitioner was not apprehended on the spot, rather he was implicated in this case on the disclosure made by the apprehended co-accused. Nothing has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. There is no compliance of Section 103 of the BNSS, 2023.

6. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner.

7. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, period of custody of the petitioner and manner of petitioner's implication, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.

8. Let the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 15,000/- (Fifteen Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Court below/concerned Court in connection with Pakribarawan P.S. Case No. 343 of 2025. (Rudra Prakash Mishra, J) Siddharth Soni/- U T