Patna High CourtCR. MISC./90416/2025dismissed

Gulshan Paswan @ Gulshan Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2026-05-12Mr. Justice Sandeep Kumar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.90416 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-191 Year-2023 Thana- NALANDA District- Nalanda ====================================================== Gulshan Paswan @ Gulshan Kumar S/O Pramod Paswan @ Pramed Paswan R/O Pandarak, Police Station- Pandarak, District- Patna ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar Patna ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Raj Krishna Jha For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Ram Sevak Choudhary For the Informant :

Mr. Pushpendra Kumar Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER 12-05-2026 Heard the parties.

2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with S.Tr. No. 620 of 2025 arising out of Nalanda P.S. Case No. 191 of 2023 registered for the offence under Sections 341,504, 506, 307, 34 of the Indian Penal Code and under Section 27 of the Arms Act. Later on Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code was also added.

3. As per the prosecution case, unknown criminals are said to have killed the deceased.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is innocent and he is in custody since 29.02.2025.

5. Learned counsel for the State and the informant

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.90416 of 2025(3) dt.12-05-2026 2/2 have opposed the application of the petitioner and have submitted that during investigation it has come that the petitioner, after taking money, has killed the deceased. He further submits that regular bail applications of other co-accused have already been rejected by this Court. The petitioner has antecedents also. Learned counsel for the informant has also assured this Court that the prosecution will co-operate in the trial and will produce the witnesses on the dates fixed.

6. In view of the allegations levelled against the petitioner and the antecedents of the petitioner, this Court is not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.

7. Accordingly, this application stands dismissed.

8. If the trial of the petitioner is not concluded at the earliest, preferably within one year then the petitioner may renew his prayer for bail.

(Sandeep Kumar, J) Vikas/- U