Patna High CourtCR. MISC./85017/2019bail granted

Vimal Kumar @ Bimal Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2020-01-07Mr. Justice S. Kumar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.85017 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-80 Year-2019 Thana- MAKHDUMPUR District- Jehanabad ====================================================== VIMAL KUMAR @ BIMAL KUMAR Son of Jattu Yadav @ Jattu Singh Ray Resident of Village-Pokharpar, Police Station-Makhdumpur, DistrictJehanabad. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Ramashankar Singh For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Braj Kishore Pd.(App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR ORAL ORDER 07-01-2020 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

Petitioner seeks bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 341, 342, 323, 379, 504, 506/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

Allegation against petitioner as per FIR is of snatching mobile of the informant.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that nothing has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner and he has been implicated in this case due to animosity. Similarly, situated co-accused person has been granted bail vide order dated 26.06.2019 passed in Criminal Miscellaneous No. 32441 of 2019. Petitioner is in custody since 15.09.2019.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.85017 of 2019(2) dt.07-01-2020 2/2 Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner named above be released on bail upon furnishing bail bond of Rs. 20,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned court below where the case is pending in connection with Makhdumpur P.S. Case No. 80 of 2019, with following conditions:- (1)Bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned.

(2) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the court and shall remain physically present as directed by the Court and his absence on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his bail bond shall be cancelled by the court below.

(3) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner.

(S. Kumar, J) ranjan/- U