Ramadhar Kumar @ Ramadhar Ray v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.72301 of 2018 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-365 Year-2018 Thana- HAJIPUR SADAR District- Vaishali ====================================================== Ramadhar Kumar @ Ramadhar Ray, Son of Chandeswar Ray, resident of Village- Panapur Gaurahi, P.S.- Hajipur Sadar, District- Vaishali. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar.

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Anil Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Madhuranand Jha ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER 04-12-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016.

The prosecution case, in short, is that 9 liters wine is recovered.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner has got no criminal antecedent. There is no allegation of tampering of witnesses alleged against the petitioner. The name of the petitioner has come on the disclosure of co-accused Chandeswar Ray. Except for this, there is no other substantive evidence to suggest the implication of the petitioner in this case. It is alleged that 9 liters wine is recovered from the house of co-

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.72301 of 2018(2) dt.04-12-2018 2/2 accused Chandeswar Ray. Nothing incriminating has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. The petitioner had no knowledge regarding the alleged incident. There is no compliance of Section 100 Cr.P.C. On behalf of the State, it is submitted that the petitioner is named in the F.I.R.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, let the petitioner, above named, in the event of arrest/surrender before the learned court below within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned 2nd Additional District and Sessions Judge-cum-Special Judge, Hajipur, Vaishali in connection with Hajipur Sadar P.S. case No.365 of 2018, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

(Sudhir Singh, J) Narendra/- U T