Shambhu Bhagat v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.83848 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-278 Year-2018 Thana- KALYANPUR District- East Champaran ====================================================== 1.

Shambhu Bhagat Son of Late Jokhan Bhagat Resident of VillageMadhuwahan, P.S.-Kotwa, District-East Champaran. 2.

Lakhraj Bhagat Son of Babu Ram Bhagat Resident of Village-Madhuwahan, P.S.-Kotwa, District-East Champaran.

3.

Vishwanath Bhagat @ Bishwanath Bhagat Son of Raman Bhagat Resident of Village-Madhuwahan, P.S.-Kotwa, District-East Champaran. 4.

Manish Bhagat Son of Vishwanath Bhagat @ Bishwanath Bhagat Resident of Village-Madhuwahan, P.S.-Kotwa, District-East Champaran. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar.

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Madhav Jha For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Murli Dhar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 05-02-2020 This application has been filed for grant of anticipatory bail on the ground that in earlier anticipatory bail application filed by the petitioners and other accused persons, in which, the petitioners have been allowed bail, but due to the wrong information supplied by Pairvikar, a submission has been made that petitioners have no criminal antecedent. From perusal of the order dated 02.05.2019 passed in Criminal Misc. No. 16374 of 2019, it appears that petitioners were granted anticipatory bail on the submission that they have no criminal antecedent and the learned court below was directed

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.83848 of 2019(3) dt.05-02-2020 2/2 to verify their criminal antecedent before accepting their bail bonds, the present application has been filed with the above submission.

Heard learned APP also who has opposed the application that this is a clear case of wrong submission and submission of antecedent.

Having heard both sides, in view of the above, I am not inclined to interfere with the earlier order passed by this Court, rather petitioner has to surrender and pray for regular bail.

With the above observations, this application is dismissed.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) Sunil Shukla/- U T