Patna High CourtCR. MISC./90673/2025bail rejected

Ramesh Thakur @ Suresh Thakur @ Shankar Thakur v. The State Of Bihar

2026-03-19Mr. Justice Partha Sarthy2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.90673 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-16 Year-2024 Thana- KALYANPUR District- Samastipur ====================================================== Ramesh Thakur @ Suresh Thakur @ Shankar Thakur Son of Late Mahendra Thakur Resident of Village - Ladaura, P.S.- Kalyanpur, District- Samastipur ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Mahendra Pratap, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Satyendra Narayan Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHA SARTHY ORAL ORDER 19-03-2026

1. Heard learned counsel for the parties.

2. The petitioner has preferred this application for grant of regular bail in connection with Kalyanpur P.S. Case no.16 of 2024 (NDPS Case no.08 of 2024) registered under sections 8, 20(b)(ii)(C), 25 and 29 of the N.D.P.S. Act and sections 25(1-B)(a), 26 and 35 of the Arms Act.

3. As per the prosecution case, 3.5 kgs of ganja and a pistol with four live cartridges was recovered from the possession of the petitioner.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the case because of his antecedents. No incriminating article has been recovered from his possession. He is in custody since 17.1.2024 and investigation in the case has concluded.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.90673 of 2025(3) dt.19-03-2026 2/2

5. The application for bail is opposed by learned A.P.P. for the State.

6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and taking into consideration the allegations in the FIR according to which there is recovery of 3.5 kgs of ganja along with a pistol with four live cartridges as also 20 criminal antecedents of the petitioner, the Court is not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail and the application is rejected.

7. Liberty is granted to the petitioner to renew his prayer for bail after six months or on framing of charge, whichever is later.

(Partha Sarthy, J) Saurabh/- U T