← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./75135/2018bail granted

Binod Mahto v. The State Of Bihar

2018-12-17Mr. Justice S. Kumar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.75135 of 2018 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-286 Year-2018 Thana- GOVERNMENT OFFICIAL COMP. District- Samastipur ====================================================== Binod Mahto Son of Late Hirday Mahto, resident of Village- Angarghat Ward No. 6, P.S. Angarghat, District- Samastipur.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Pankaj Kumar Das For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Sri Satyadev Prasad Singh Yadav ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR ORAL ORDER 17-12-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

Petitioner, who is in custody, seeks bail in connection with Excise P.S. Case No. 286 of 2018 registered for the offence punishable under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016.

Allegation against petitioner is of recovery of 20 litres of Toddy from his hut.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that petitioner has no criminal antecedent and he is in custody since 30.09.2018.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner named above be released on bail upon

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.75135 of 2018(2) dt.17-12-2018 2/2 furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned A.D.J.-Vith-cum-Special Judge Excise, Samastipur, in connection with Excise P.S. Case No. 286 of 2018 subject to the conditions that:-

(1) Bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned.

(2) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be represented on each and every date fixed by the court.

(3) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner.

(4) If the petitioner is found involved in similar nature of offences, after his release on bail the trial court shall take steps to cancel his bail bond.

(S. Kumar, J) veena/- U T