Patna High CourtCR. MISC./76709/2018bail granted

Suraj Kumar And ANR v. The State Of Bihar

2018-12-19Mr. Justice S. Kumar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.76709 of 2018 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-81 Year-2018 Thana- SIGAUDI District- Patna ======================================================

1. Suraj Kumar son of Sri Vijay Paswan.

2. Rambabu Kumar, Son of Rajesh Paswan.

Both resident of village and P.O. Babhana, P.S. and District- Jehanabad. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State Of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Ashok Kumar Garg For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Sri Asharaf Ansari ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR ORAL ORDER 19-12-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

Petitioner, who is in custody, seeks bail in connection with Sigaudi P.S. Case No. 81 of 2018 registered for the offence punishable under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise (Amendment) Act, 2016.

Allegation against petitioner is of recovery of 50 litres of Mahua wine from the sack.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that petitioner has no criminal antecedent and he is in custody since 21.10.2018.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner named above be released on bail upon

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.76709 of 2018(2) dt.19-12-2018 2/2 furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Special Judge (Excise) Patna, in connection with Sigaudi P.S. Case No. 81 of 2018 subject to the conditions that:-

(1) Bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned.

(2) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be represented on each and every date fixed by the court.

(3) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner.

(4) If the petitioner is found involved in similar nature of offences, after his release on bail the trial court shall take steps to cancel his bail bond.

(S. Kumar, J) veena/- U T