Jai Kumar Sahani @ Jai Kuwar Sahani v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.76725 of 2018 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-156 Year-2018 Thana- MADHUBAN District- East Champaran ====================================================== Jai Kumar Sahani @ Jai Kuwar Sahani, Son of Kishundeo Sahani, Resident of Village- Kothiya, P.S.- Madhuban, District- East Champaran. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar.

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Umesh Chandra Verma For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Sri Braj Kishore Prasad ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR ORAL ORDER 20-12-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

Petitioner, who is in custody, seeks bail in connection with Madhuban P.S. Case No. 156/2018 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 341, 323, 324, 307, 379, 504, 506, 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

Allegation against petitioner is of assaulting the informant by means of Garasi, causing head injury. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that he is innocent and has been falsely implicated in this case due to previous land dispute. Informant has sustained two injuries, which are simple in nature. Petitioner is in custody since 19.09.2018.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.76725 of 2018(2) dt.20-12-2018 2/2 Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner named above be released on bail upon furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned 4th Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, East Champaran at Motihari, in connection with Madhuban P.S. Case No. 156/2018 subject to the conditions that:-

(1) Bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned.

(2) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the court and his absence on two consecutive dates without proper and sufficient reason the trial court will be at liberty to cancel his bail bond.

(3) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner.

(S. Kumar, J) veena/- U T