Vikash Yadav @ Vikash Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.89378 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-141 Year-2025 Thana- JAMUI District- Jamui ====================================================== Vikash Yadav @ Vikash Kumar Son of Late Palo Yadav R/o Village - Daulatpur, P.S.- Jamui, District - Jamui ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Brajesh Sahay, Advocate Ms. Amrita Kumari, Advocate Ms. Harshita, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Tarkeshwar Nath Thakur, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 18-02-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. Petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 191(2), 190, 115(2), 109, 132, 262, 263, 310(6), 121(1), 281, 125(a), 125(b), 324(5), 303(2), 317(2), 317(5), 352 and 126(2) of B.N.S., 2023.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is a person with clean antecedent and in sum and substance, the allegation, as alleged in the FIR, is that a tractor laden with sand was apprehended and the driver fled but a crowd of 40-50 persons assembled and they, by using criminal force, got the tractor freed and fled away with the tractor.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has been falsely implicated in the instant case by the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.89378 of 2025(2) dt.18-02-2026 2/2 informant. It is next submitted that petitioner is not the owner of the tractor which was seized and subsequently taken away by the crowd. It is next submitted that petitioner being a resident of nearby place, out of inquisitiveness, had gone to the place of occurrence as he came to know that ruckus is being created. It is also reiterated and submitted that petitioner is a person with clean antecedent.

5. Learned APP opposes the anticipatory bail application.

6. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner and taking into consideration the facts that petitioner is a person with clean antecedent and is not the owner of the tractor, let petitioner, above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender within a period of six weeks from today, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned C.J.M., Jamui in connection with Jamui P.S. Case No.141 of 2025, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) of the B.N.S.S.

(Satyavrat Verma, J) Sanjay/- U T