Aditya Verma @ Vikash Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.78094 of 2018 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-472 Year-2018 Thana- GANDHIMAIDAN District- Patna ====================================================== Aditya Verma @ Vikash Kumar S/o Yogendra Prasad Verma, R/o Vill.- Lakhochak, P.S.- Chanan, District- Lakhisarai. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Anil Chandra, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Dr. Rabindra Kumar (APP) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR ORAL ORDER 08-01-2019 Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

Petitioner, who is in custody, seeks bail in connection with Gandhi Maidan P.S. Case No. 472 of 2018 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 467, 468, 471, 419, 420 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 10 of Bihar Examination Act, 1981.

Informant has alleged that petitioner had appeared in the name of Vikash Kumar in the examination of Railway and subsequently in the name of Aditya Verma and he was apprehended. After inquiry it was found that petitioner had passed matriculation examination in two different names as Vikash Kumar and Aditya Verma.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.78094 of 2018(2) dt.08-01-2019 2/2 that he is innocent and has committed no offence. He has been falsely implicated in this case. Petitioner has no criminal antecedent and is in custody since 04.10.2018. Considering the aforesaid fact and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner named above be released on bail upon furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned A.C.J.M.-XVII, Patna, in connection with Gandhi Maidan P.S. Case No. 472 of 2018, subject to conditions:

(1) Bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned.

(2) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the court and shall remain physically present as directed by Court and his absence on two consecutive dates without sufficient reasons, his bail bond shall be cancelled by the court below.

(3) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner. (S. Kumar, J) Rajiv/- U T