← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./77970/2018bail granted

Santosh Choudhary v. The State Of Bihar

2019-01-08Mr. Justice S. Kumar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.77970 of 2018 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-364 Year-2018 Thana- BHAGALPUR KOTWALI DistrictBhagalpur ====================================================== Santosh Choudhary S/o Late Naresh Choudhary, R/o Vill.- Daradhi, P.S.- Sahour, District- Bhagalpur.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Vivekanand Vivek For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Sri Anil Kumar Singh 1 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR ORAL ORDER 08-01-2019 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

Petitioner seeks bail in Kotwali (Tilkamanjhi) P.S. Case No. 364 of 2018 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 379/411 of the Indian Penal Code. Allegation against the petitioner is recovery of one stolen motorcycle and one mobile from his possession which is being denied by him.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that he is innocent and has falsely implicated in this case. Petitioner has no criminal antecedent and he is in custody since 04.06.2018.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner named above be released on bail upon

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.77970 of 2018(2) dt.08-01-2019 2/2 furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned C.J.M., Bhagalpur in connection with Kotwali (Tilkamanjhi) P.S. Case No. 364 of 2018, with following conditions:- (1)Bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned.

(2) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the court and shall remain physically present as directed by the Court and his absence on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his bail bond shall be cancelled by the court below.

(3) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner.

(S. Kumar, J) Sanjay/- U T