Ramphal Manjhi v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.77861 of 2018 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-367 Year-2018 Thana- ATRI District- Gaya ====================================================== Ramphal Manjhi Son of Mahabir Manjhi Resident of village - Bagodar Bigha, P.S. Wazir Ganj Distt. - Gaya.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Sunil Kumar Yadav, Advcoate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Sri Dilip Kumar (APP) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR ORAL ORDER 03-01-2019 Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

Petitioner, who is in custody, seeks bail in connection with Atri P.S. Case No. 367 of 2018 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 272, 273 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 30 (a) (d) of Excise Act. Allegation is of recovery of 12 liters mahua liquor from the possession of the petitioner.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that he is innocent and has committed no offence. He has been falsely implicated in this case. Petitioner has no criminal antecedent and is in custody since 18.10.2018. Considering the aforesaid fact and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner named above be released on bail upon

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.77861 of 2018(2) dt.03-01-2019 2/2 furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Special Excise Judge, Gaya, in connection with Atri P.S. Case No. 367 of 2018, subject to conditions:

(1) Bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned.

(2) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be represented on each and every date fixed by the court.

(3) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner.

(4) If the petitioner is found involved in similar nature of offences, after his release on bail the trial court shall take steps to cancel his bail bonds.

(S. Kumar, J) Rajiv/- U T