Patna High CourtCR. MISC./83443/2019bail granted

Shravan Mahto v. The State Of Bihar

2020-01-06Mr. Justice S. Kumar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.83443 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-146 Year-2019 Thana- GOVERNMENT OFFICIAL COMP. District- Sitamarhi ====================================================== SHRAVAN MAHTO Son of Ram Chandra Mahto Resident of Village - Yadupatti Simari, P.S.- Pupari, District- Sitamarhi ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Hans Lal Kumar, Adv For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Sanjay Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR ORAL ORDER 06-01-2020 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

Petitioner who is in custody seeks bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under Section 30(A) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016.

Allegation is of recovery of 36.900 litres of Nepali Soufi Liquor from two persons while they were coming from Nepal to India.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that he is innocent and has been falsely implicated in this case on suspicion. Nothing has been recovered from the possession of the petitioner. Petitioner has got no criminal antecedent and is in custody since 06.11.2019.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.83443 of 2019(2) dt.06-01-2020 2/2 the case, let the petitioner named above be released on bail upon furnishing bail bond of Rs. 20,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned court below where the case is pending, in connection with G.O. Case No. 146 of 2019, with following conditions:- (1)Bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned.

(2) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the court.

(3) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner. (4). If the petitioner is found involved in similar nature of offence, after his release on bail, the trial court shall take steps to cancel his bail bond.

(S. Kumar, J) ranjan/- U