Satyam Yadav @ Satyam Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.91280 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-233 Year-2023 Thana- CHAUSA District- Madhepura ====================================================== Satyam Yadav @ Satyam Kumar S/o Late-Jay Prakash Yadav @ Late Prakash Yadav, Resident of Village- Rasalpur, Dhuria, Kalasan, Ward No. 14, P.S.- Chausa, District- Madhepura.

... ... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party ====================================================== with CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 4244 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-233 Year-2023 Thana- CHAUSA District- Madhepura ====================================================== Sittu Yadav @ Sintu Kumar Son of Deep Narayan Yadav @ DipNarayan Yadav, Resident of Village - Rasalpur Dhuriya, Ward No. 11, P.S. - Chausa, Distt. - Madhepura.

... ... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

(In CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 91280 of 2025) For the Petitioner :

Mr. Pawan Kumar, Advocate For the State :

Mr. Jitendra Kumar Singh, APP (In CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 4244 of 2026) For the Petitioner :

Mr. Sanjiv Kumar, Advocate For the State :

Mr. Kalyan Shankar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN KUMAR JHA ORAL ORDER 24-02-2026 Both the criminal miscellaneous petitions have arisen out of the same police station case number, hence they are being heard together and decided by a common order.

2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P. for the State.

3. In the present case, the petitioners seek bail in connection with Chausa P.S. Case No. 233 of 2023 dated 16.08.2023, registered for the offences punishable under Sections

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.91280 of 2025(3) dt.24-02-2026 2/3 341, 354A, 307, 504 and 506 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act.

4. As per the prosecution case, petitioners and other co-accused persons tried to forcibly take away the niece of the informant. When informant intervened, he was assaulted by the petitioners and co-accused persons, who subsequently fired upon him, causing injury in his left shoulder and right leg.

5. It is submitted by learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners that petitioners are innocent and they have falsely been implicated in the present case. The petitioners neither misbehaved with the niece of the informant nor abused or assaulted her. The allegation of firing is non-specific and general and omnibus. There was no intention to cause death. It is next submitted by learned counsel for the petitioners that petitioner in Cr. Misc. No. 91280 of 2025 is having antecedent of four cases and out of four cases he is on bail in one case and petitioner in Cr. Misc. No. 4244 of 2026 is having antecedent of six cases and out of six cases he is on bail in one case. It is lastly submitted by learned counsel for the petitioners that both the petitioners are in custody since 13.02.2025 and chargesheet has been submitted.

6. Learned A.P.P. appearing on behalf of the State opposes the submissions made on behalf of the petitioners.

7. Having regard to the facts and circumstances and submissions made on behalf of the parties and considering the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.91280 of 2025(3) dt.24-02-2026 3/3 submission of chargesheet and period of custody of the petitioners, the petitioners, above-named, are directed to be released on bail, on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand Only) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Udakishunganj, Madhepura / concerned Court, in connection with Chausa P.S. Case No. 233 of 2023, subject to the condition laid down under Section 480(3) of the B.N.S.S. and other following conditions:

(i) One of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioners.

(ii) The petitioners will remain present on each and every date fixed by the court below, if so required by the learned trial Court.

(iii) In case of absence on three consecutive dates or in violation of the terms of the bail, the bail bond of the petitioners will be liable to be cancelled by the Court concerned. (Arun Kumar Jha, J) Shahnawaz/- U T