Md. Jameer v. The State Of Bihar And ANR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.78369 of 2018 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-48 Year-2018 Thana- COMPLAINT CASE District- Supaul ====================================================== Md. Jameer, son of Ishak Marhum, resident of village Islampur, Gram Panchayat- Pathra, P.S. Pipra, District Supaul ... ... Petitioner
Versus
1. State of Bihar
2. Sabina Khatoon, wife of Md. Jameer, resident of village Islampur, Gram Panchayat Pathra North, P.S. Pipra, District Supaul ... ... Opposite Parties ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Ashok Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Awadhesh Kumar Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 08-01-2019 Petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Complaint Case No. 48C of 2018 lodged for the offences punishable under Sections 498A, 420, 379, 323 and 504 of the Indian Penal Code.
Petitioner happens to be husband and there is allegation of demand of dowry, subjecting her to cruelty and torture.
Submission of learned counsel for the petitioner is that complaint petition itself shows that petitioner is aged 60 years and marriage was solemnized 20 years ago, having four children.
Heard learned APP also.
Having heard both sides and in the facts and
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.78369 of 2018(2) dt.08-01-2019 2/2 circumstances, let petitioner, above named, in the event of arrest or surrender within a period of six weeks from the receipt of this order, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-III, Supaul, in connection with Complaint Case No. 48C of 2018, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure and further condition that one of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immoveable properties within the jurisdiction of the court concerned and further in future if complainant files maintenance case, the petitioner has to cooperate in maintenance case, otherwise the complainant may file application for cancellation of his bail bond. (Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) spal/- U T