Govind Chaudhary v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.267 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-225 Year-2018 Thana- BARUN District- Aurangabad ====================================================== Govind Chaudhary s/o Pran Chaudhary, R/o village Sohda, P.s. Narari Kala Khurd, Distt.- Aurangabad ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Ashok Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Ram Priya Saran Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVAJI PANDEY ORAL ORDER 11-01-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

In this case, the petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Barun P.S. Case No. 225 of 2018 registered for offences under sections 379/411/420/34 of the Indian Penal Code, 4/40 BMMCR Rules & 15 of the Environmental Protection Act.

As per allegation, the police seized the Tractor loaded with sand.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the seized tractor, bearing Engine No. 3100FLU831772274F18 & Chasis No. DYASG78122753, is standing in the name of the petitioner, he was not found at the place of occurrence rather his driver was using the tractor for illegal transportation of sand

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.267 of 2019(2) dt.11-01-2019 2/2 without his knowledge.

Looking to the entire facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner, namely, Govind Chaudhary, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of four weeks from today, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Aurangabad in connection with Barun P.S. Case No. 225 of 2018, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. as also subject to condition that whenever the police will call the petitioner for investigation/interrogation, he will remain present and if he would not present himself, the privilege of grant of anticipatory bail shall be deemed to have been canceled. It is also made clear that if the petitioner is again found involved in the similar activity, the prosecution will be at liberty to cancel his anticipatory bail.

(Shivaji Pandey, J) rishi/- U T