Ram Deo Sharma v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.89323 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-115 Year-2025 Thana- MIRGANJ District- Purnia ====================================================== 1.
Ram Deo Sharma S/o- Late Sinchu Sharma, Resident of Kajara P.S.- Mirganj, Dist- Purnea 2.
Chandan Sharma S/o- Sri Ram Deo Sharma, Resident of Kajara P.SMirganj, Dist- Purnea ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Amit Kumar Anand, Advocate For the State :
Mr. Humayou Ahmad Khan, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA KUMAR ORAL ORDER 07-04-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.
2. The petitioners seek bail, apprehending their arrest, in connection with Mirganj P.S. Case No. 115 of 2025 dated 19.06.2025, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 126(2), 352, 351(2), 109 and 3(5) of BNS, 2023 and Section 27 of the Arms Act.
3. As per allegation, the petitioners along with other co-accused came to the door of the informant and abused and threatened him and the co-accused/Ravi Sharma did firing at the door and courtyard of the house of the informant.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.89323 of 2025(3) dt.07-04-2026 2/3 petitioners are innocent and have falsely been implicated in this case. He further submits that there is no overt-act against the petitioners regarding firing or intention to kill and there is no injury to anybody as per the alleged occurrence.
5. It is also stated in paragraph no. 2 of the bail petition that the petitioners have not moved this Court earlier either for anticipatory bail or regular one in the instant case.
6. It has further been stated in paragraph no.3 of the bail petition that the petitioner No.1 has no criminal antecedent and petitioner No.2 has two criminal antecedents.
7. However, learned APP for the State vehemently opposes the prayer of the Petitioners for bail.
8. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, this petition is allowed, directing the petitioners, above-named, to be enlarged on bail, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt / production of a copy of this order, on their furnishing bail bonds in the sum of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned concerned Court Below, in connection with Mirganj P.S. Case No. 115 of 2025, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482 (2) of the B.N.S.S., 2023 and on the
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.89323 of 2025(3) dt.07-04-2026 3/3 following conditions:
(i) In case, it is brought to the notice of the court below that the petitioners have any criminal antecedents other than the disclosed one, learned court below shall cancel the bail bonds of the petitioners after hearing them and getting satisfied that the petitioners have concealed their criminal antecedents despite their knowledge of the same.
(ii) In case, it is brought to the notice of the court below that statement regarding previous bail petition is wrong, learned court below shall cancel the bail bonds of the petitioners.
(Jitendra Kumar, J.) ravishankar/- U T