Veer Bahadur Singh v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.79860 of 2018 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-289 Year-2018 Thana- NOKHA District- Rohtas ====================================================== Veer Bahadur Singh S/o Sri Rama Shankar Singh R/v-Karhansi,PSNatwar,Distt.-Rohtas,A/p Ward No.8, Nokha,PS-Nokha,Distt.-Rohtas. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Shashank Shekhar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Dr. Kumar Uday Pratap ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR ORAL ORDER 10-01-2019 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

Petitioner seeks bail in Nokha P.S. Case No. 289 of 2018 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 341, 323, 307, 379/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

Informant is the father of the Chandan Kumar who has alleged that due to dispute of minor nature, petitioner and his other associates assaulted his son in the Salloon and as a result of which his son sustained head injury.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that allegation is against six F.I.R. named accused of assaulting Chandan Kumar and there is no specific allegation against the petitioner. Allegations are general and omnibus in nature. It has further been submitted that there is case and counter case and injury has been sustained by both the sides. Petitioner has no

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.79860 of 2018(2) dt.10-01-2019 2/2 criminal antecedent and he is in custody since 11.11.2018. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner named above be released on bail upon furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate, Rohtas in connection with Nokha P.S. Case No. 289 of 2018, with following conditions:- (1)Bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned.

(2) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the court and shall remain physically present as directed by the Court and his absence on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his bail bond shall be cancelled by the court below.

(3) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner.

(S. Kumar, J) Sanjay/- U T