Rohit Kumar Mehta @ Rohit Kumar v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.91040 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-133 Year-2025 Thana- MAHILA P.S. District- Nalanda ====================================================== Rohit Kumar Mehta @ Rohit Kumar S/o- Ajay Kumar Mehta @ Ajay Mahto R/v- Telhara, Ps- Telhara Dist- Nalanda ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
The State of Bihar 2.
XX C/o- YY R/v- Tehhara Ps- Tehhara Dist- Nalanda ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Rana Baljit Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mrs. Renuka Ratanakar (App125) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA ORAL ORDER 13-01-2026 Heard Mr. Rana Baljit Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mrs. Renuka Ratanakar, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.
2. The petitioner seeks bail, who is in custody since 11.08.2025 in connection with Mahila P.S. Case No. 133 of 2025, (POCSO Case No. 144/2025) F.I.R. dated 11.08.2025 for the offences punishable under Sections 64(1), 75, 78 of the B.N.S. and section 4/6 of the POCSO Act and sections 67, 67 (A) of the I.T. Act.
3. Allegation against the petitioner is that he had sexually exploited the victim girl by making her obscene video and also threatened to made it viral.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.91040 of 2025(2) dt.13-01-2026 2/2 petitioner has clean antecedent and he has falsely been implicated in the present case. The allegation as alleged is false and fabricated and the petitioner has not committed any offence as in the F.I.R.
5. Learned APP for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for bail of the petitioner and submitted that the statement of victim was recorded under section 180 and 183 BNSS which suggests that the victim has supported the case of prosecution and she has also stated that the petitioner has repetitively penetrative sexual assault with her
6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case and serious nature of allegation made against the petitioner, I am not inclined to enlarge the accused-petitioner on bail.
7. Hence, the prayer for regular bail stands rejected. (Rajesh Kumar Verma, J) Ranjeet/- U T