Arbind Singh v. The State Of Bihar Through Sri Manish Kumar Verma, The Secretary, Planning And Development Departme

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.2303 of 2018 In Letters Patent Appeal No.2303 of 2016 ====================================================== Arbind Singh Son of Late Chhatradhari Singh Resident of Village and P.O. Barauni Deorhi, Panchayat No. - 3, P.S. - Teghra, District - Begusarai. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State Of Bihar Through Sri Manish Kumar Verma, The Secretary, Planning And Development Departme 2.

Sri Rahul Kumar, The Collector, Begusarai, District - Begusarai. 3.

Sri Kanchan Kumar, The District Development Commissioner, Begusarai, District - Begusarai.

4.

Sri Ashutosh Kumar Sinha, The District Planning Officer, Begusarai District Begusarai.

5.

Sri Rajeev Singh, The Circle Officer, Teghra, District Begusarai. ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Nawal Kishore Singh For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Md. Khurshid Alam - Aag 12 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P. B. BAJANTHRI and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA KUMAR ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P. B. BAJANTHRI) 21-06-2023 Mr. Raushan Kushwaha, District Magistrate, Begusarai is present in the Court.

2. During pendency of the present MJC-contempt petition, concerned respondent have disbursed compensation amount to the extent of 1,83,000/- (Rupees One Lakh Eighty ₹ Three Thousand Only) on 20.06.2023. It does not carry interest from the date it was due, in this regard the petitioner is permitted to make a detailed representation. Concerned

Patna High Court MJC No.2303 of 2018(7) dt.21-06-2023 2/2 respondent proceed to calculate interest and disburse the same at the earliest.

3. Further, if petitioner is disputed in respect of fixation of compensation of 1,83,000/- (Rupees One Lakh ₹ Eighty Three Thousand Only) he is also at liberty to submit a detailed representation. If such representation is submitted the concerned authority is hereby directed to pass a detailed speaking order and communicate the same to the petitioner within a reasonable period of time.

4. With the above observation, the present contempt proceedings stands dropped.

5. If the concerned respondent fails to comply, petitioner is at liberty to file Interlocutory Application in reviving contempt proceedings.

(P. B. Bajanthri, J) (Jitendra Kumar, J) abhishekkr/- U