Patna High CourtCR. MISC./91802/2025dismissed

Rambharos Kumar @ Ram Bharos Kunwar @ Rambharosi v. The State Of Bihar

2026-02-12Mr. Justice Sandeep Kumar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.91802 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-358 Year-2024 Thana- BEGUSARAI MUFFASIL DistrictBegusarai ====================================================== Rambharos Kumar @ Ram Bharos Kunwar @ Rambharosi Son of Late Ram Surat Kunwar Village - Kaithma, P.S.- Begusarai Muffasil, District - Begusarai.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Shubhesh Pandey For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Rina Sinha ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER 12-02-2026 Heard the parties.

2. This is the second attempt of the petitioner for grant of regular bail in connection with Begusarai Muffasil P.S. Case No. 358 of 2024. Earlier the bail application of the petitioner was rejected vide order dated 03.09.2025 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 42721 of 2025 which reads as under:- "Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Muffasil P.S. Case No. 358 of 2024 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 308(5), 352, 351(2) and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and Section 27 of the Arms Act.

3. The petitioner and his brother demanded extortion and shot at the old lady. Thereafter, they took away Rs. 20,000/- from the informant.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.91802 of 2025(2) dt.12-02-2026 2/2

4. The petitioner is accused in six more cases of similar and serious nature. The petitioner is in custody since 30.10.2024.

5. Considering the gravity of the offence and the antecedent, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.

6. Accordingly, the application stands dismissed. "

3. It has very fairly been submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the charge has already been framed in this case but the same is delayed and the petitioner is in custody since 30.10.2024.

4. In view of the fact that the trial is progressing and the considering the gravity of the offence, this Court finds no new ground to review its earlier order.

5. Accordingly, this application is dismissed.

6. The Superintendent of Police, Begusarai is directed to ensure the attendance of the witnesses in the trial.

7. Let a copy of this order be communicated to the Superintendent of Police, Begusarai through FAX for its compliance.

(Sandeep Kumar, J) Vikas/- U