← Library
Patna High CourtMJC/2610/2018dismissed

Naushad Alam And ORS v. The State Of Bihar Through The Chief Secretary, Bihar, Patna, Shri Deepak Kumar And ORS

2019-03-28Mr. Justice Mohit Kumar Shah2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.2610 of 2018 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.9756 of 2017 ====================================================== 1.

Naushad Alam Son of Late Nawab Miyan resident of Village- Madhopur Sheikh Toli, Post- Madhopur, Tansariya, P.S.- Turkailiya, District- East Champaran.

2.

Dilip Kumar, Son of Shambh Prasad Yadav, Resident of Village PostNimoiya, P.S. Ghodasahan, District- East Champaran. 3.

Pawan Kumar Yadav, Son of Baidhyanath Rai, resident of Village PostRamkaran Pakri, P.S.- Chakiya, District- East Champaran. 4.

Jawed Alam, Son of Shafi Ahmad, resident of Village- Jogaurliya Thela Gulab, Post- Rupni, P.S.- Madhuban, District- East Champaran. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State Of Bihar Through The Chief Secretary, Bihar, Patna, Shri Deepak Kumar 2.

Shri Amir Subhani, Principal Secretary, Home Police Department, Bihar, Patna.

3.

Sri Raman Kumar, District Magistrate, East Champaran, Motihari. ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Abhinav Srivastava For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Prabhat Kumar Verma - Aag 3 : Dr. Anand Kumar : Sanjay Kr. Ghosh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH ORAL ORDER 28-03-2019 The learned Additional Advocate General Sri Verma, in compliance of the order of this Court dated 18.05.2018 passed in CWJC no. 9756 of 2017, has produced an order whereby and whereunder the petitioners herein have been permitted to submit their joining subject to the result of the appeal filed by the State bearing L.P.A. no. 417 of 2019 and L.P.A. no. 419 of 2019.

Patna High Court MJC No.2610 of 2018(5) dt.28-03-2019 2/2 Having regard to the facts and circumstances of this case and considering the fact that the learned counsel for the petitioners does not dispute the factum of compliance of the order of this Court dated 18.05.2018, there is no need to proceed further in the present proceedings, hence the contempt petition is dismissed.

(Mohit Kumar Shah, J) rinkee/- U